- 1. JavaScript design patterns #1. Singleton and the Module
- 2. JavaScript design patterns #2. Factories and their implementation in TypeScript
- 3. JavaScript design patterns #3. The Facade pattern and applying it to React Hooks
- 4. JavaScript design patterns #4. Decorators and their implementation in TypeScript
- 5. JavaScript design patterns #5. The Observer pattern with TypeScript
The Observer pattern is common among various native JavaScript features and many libraries. The above is just one of the reasons to look into it more. In this article, we learn the principles of the Observer pattern. We also add some TypeScript typings to it, to make it more bug-proof.
The core principle of the Observer pattern is defining a mechanism of subscription to notify various objects about events. The notified objects have to explicitly state that they are interested in the above events first. The above is a common situation in JavaScript. We sometimes have some libraries taking care of the above tasks. On the other hand, it might be beneficial to know how it works under the hood.
The subject holds a list of observers and calls every one of them in case it wants to communicate something.
1 2 3 |
class Subject { observers = []; } |
There are a few things to consider when designing a list of observers. Let’s assume that we want it to have no duplicates. The second thing that we want to provide is a straightforward way to unsubscribe from the list of observers. A better candidate than an array to implement the above features is a Set.
1 2 3 |
class Subject { observers = new Set(); } |
The Set object lets you store unique values of any type, whether primitive values or object references
The observer with the update function
There are a few approaches that we can take. The first of them includes creating an Observer class.
1 2 3 4 5 |
class Observer { update(message) { console.log(message); } } |
Our Observer class contains the update method. Let’s now expect every Observer to implement it. With that knowledge, we can continue writing the Subject class.
Since now we expect every Observer to implement the update method, we call it when we want to notify our observers.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 |
class Subject { observers = new Set(); subscribe(observer) { this.observers.add(observer); } notify(message) { this.observers.forEach((observer) => { observer.update(message); }) } } |
1 2 3 4 5 6 |
const subject = new Subject(); subject.subscribe(new Observer()); subject.subscribe(new Observer()); subject.notify('Hello world!'); |
Hello world!
Hello world!
Thanks to using a Set, we don’t have to worry about duplicates when subscribing. Therefore, they will be omitted.
An important note is that a Set looks at object references when checking for duplicates. Even though we added two identical observers, they are two different objects.
1 |
new Observer() === new Observer() // false |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
const subject = new Subject(); const observer = new Observer(); subject.subscribe(observer); subject.subscribe(observer); subject.notify('Hello world!'); |
Hello world!
Since above we subscribe using the same observer twice, it is added only once.
The thing left to implement is the unsubscribe method.
1 2 3 |
unsubscribe(observer) { this.observers.delete(observer); } |
The same thing applies to the delete function of a Set. Therefore, our unsubscribe function needs to be provided with the same object in order to delete it.
Unsubscribing to prevent the lapsed listener issue
Remember always to unsubscribe if you don’t need the observer to listen anymore. Forgetting to do so prevents the observer from being garbage-collected. This is an issue that we call the lapsed listener problem. A solution to the above problem might be using the WeakSet instead of Set, but it doesn’t allow us to iterate its elements.
If you want to know more about the garbage collector check out those two articles:
The observer as a function
Another popular approach would be to use functions as observers. This time we don’t need the Observer class.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 |
class Subject { observers = new Set(); subscribe(observer) { this.observers.add(observer); } unsubscribe(observer) { this.observers.delete(observer); } notify(message) { this.observers.forEach((observer) => { observer(message); }) } } |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
const subject = new Subject(); subject.subscribe((message) => { console.log(message); }); subject.notify('Hello world!'); |
Hello world!
The above approach might ring a bell for you, and rightfully so. We can often see it when using native JavaScript features.
1 2 3 |
window.addEventListener('load', () => { console.log('Page loaded') }); |
We can take advantage of the above functionality and use it with our Subject to add some default logic to our event observers.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 |
class PhoneInputSubject { observers = new Set(); subscribe(observer) { this.observers.add(observer); } unsubscribe(observer) { this.observers.delete(observer); } shouldObserversBeNotified(message) { return /[+]*[0-9]+[+. -]*$/.test(message); } notify(message) { if(this.shouldObserversBeNotified(message)) { this.observers.forEach((observer) => { observer(message); }) } } } |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 |
const subject = new PhoneInputSubject(); subject.subscribe((phoneNumber) => { console.log(`A new proper phone number: ${phoneNumber}`); }); window.addEventListener('load', () => { const phoneInput = document.querySelector('#phoneInput'); if (phoneInput) { phoneInput.addEventListener('change', (event) => { subject.notify(event.target.value) }); } }); |
Adding TypeScript to our Observer
Expecting the Observer to have the update method or to be a function is a rather bold assumption. It is a very fitting place to introduce TypeScript. First, let’s define the basics of our Observer:
1 2 3 |
interface Observer { update: (message: any) => void; } |
Above, we demand that every observer implements the update method. We don’t enforce the message type here, so we leave it as any.
We use the above interface in our Subject class.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 |
class Subject { private observers = new Set<Observer>(); subscribe(observer: Observer) { this.observers.add(observer); } unsubscribe(observer: Observer) { this.observers.delete(observer); } notify(message: string) { this.observers.forEach((observer) => { observer.update(message); }) } } |
The essential thing above is that the Subject accepts any Observer as long as it has the update method.
1 2 3 4 5 |
class MyObserver implements Observer { update(message: string) { console.log(message); } } |
1 2 3 4 5 6 |
const subject = new Subject(); const observer = new MyObserver(); subject.subscribe(observer); subject.notify('Hello world!'); |
The above approach makes our Subject highly reusable and generic while making sure that the update function is there.
1 2 3 4 5 |
class MyObserver implements Observer { hello() { console.log('Hello world!') } } |
Class ‘MyObserver’ incorrectly implements interface ‘Observer’.
Property ‘update’ is missing in type ‘MyObserver’ but required in type ‘Observer’.
Summary
In this article, we’ve gone through a popular and useful design pattern. Implementing it from the ground up gave us a bit of an insight into how this mechanism could work in some of the native JavaScript features. Aside from using JavaScript, we’ve also implemented TypeScript. By doing so, we’ve taken a precaution to make sure that we’ve built our observers properly. Learning all of the above surely gives us an additional tool under our programming belt.
thanks